Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journalism
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Domke, D.
Right arrow Articles by Spratt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The primes of our times?

An examination of the ‘power’ of visual images

David Domke

Department of Communications, Box 353740, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. domke{at}u.washington.edu

David Perlmutter

Manship School of Mass Communication, 221 Journalism Building, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 7202, USA. dperlmu{at}lsu.edu

Meg Spratt

University of Washington; David Domke. mspratt{at}u.washington.edu

Claims by political and news elites about the influence of visual images are far more common than actual evidence of such effects. This research attempts to gain insight into the ‘power’ of visual images, specifically those that accompany lexical–verbal messages in the press. We argue that the widely held notion that vivid images often drive public opinion is overly simplistic; in contrast, we posit that images most often interact with individuals' existing understandings of the world to shape information processing and judgments. With this in mind, we conducted an experiment in which news coverage was systematically altered – as including a famous photograph widely attributed great influence, or not – within otherwise constant information environments. Findings suggest that visual news images (a) influence people's information processing in ways that can be understood only by taking into account individuals' predispositions and values, and (b) at the same time appear to have a particular ability to ‘trigger’ considerations that spread through one's mental framework to other evaluations.

Key Words: icons • information processing • news media • photojournalism • priming • visual images

Journalism, Vol. 3, No. 2, 131-159 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/146488490200300211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GazetteHome page
S. Fahmy and D. Kim
Picturing the Iraq War: Constructing the Image of War in the British and US Press
International Communication Gazette, December 1, 2008; 70(6): 443 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Visual CommunicationHome page
D. D. Perlmutter and N. S. Dahmen
(In)visible evidence: pictorially enhanced disbelief in the Apollo moon landings
Visual Communication, May 1, 2008; 7(2): 229 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
T. Petersen
Testing Visual Signals in Representative Surveys
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2005; 17(4): 456 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Visual CommunicationHome page
D. D. Perlmutter and G. Golan
Counter-imaging: myth-making and Americanization in Israeli Labor Party campaign ads, 2003
Visual Communication, October 1, 2005; 4(3): 304 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]