| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Functional truth or sexist distortion?Assessing a feminist critique of intimate violence reportingStanford University, jmcmanus{at}stanford.edu
Berkeley Media Studies Group, dorfman{at}bmsg.org Journalism assumes reporters are able to pursue functional truth - an account of issues and events reliably describing social reality. But researchers have often found systematic bias. In reporting about cross-gender violence, critical feminist scholars contend that news media devalue violence against women and often blame the victim while mitigating or blurring the perpetrators responsibility. The present study is the first in the USA to test this critique as it applies to reporting the vast social pathology of intimate-partner violence. Consistent with the critique, intimate violence was covered much less often and with less depth than other violence of similar gravity. In contrast, however, the newspapers studied very rarely blamed female battering victims or mitigated suspect blame.
Key Words: blaming the victim domestic violence feminist theory framing functional truth intimate-partner violence journalism news coverage objectivity violence against women
Journalism, Vol. 6, No. 1,
43-65 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
